The press are reporting new moves to repatriate the Koh-i-Noor diamond to the Punjab. This is nothing new - the Indians
requested the diamond’s return in 1947 and again in 1953, the year
of the coronation of Queen Elizabeth II. Then, in 1976, Pakistan joined in,
asserting its ownership of the gem. Further claims were made when the Queen made her state visit in 1997, and David Cameron
squashed similar demands as recently as 2010.
So this comes up every so often, but it's a good excuse to write about a nice bit of glitter. It also prompts me to put a post on
Duleep Singh onto my to-do list, so watch this space.
The Koh-i-Nor was acquired by the Crown in 1850, when Duleep Singh ceded it following the East India Company's
conquest of the Punjab - as laid out in a clause of the Treaty of Lahore. The argument for repatriation is that Duleep Singh didn't have the authority to alienate a part of Punjab's patrimony. However, the diamond had only been in the Singh's hands for a generation.
The early history of the jewel is unclear. It may have been discovered in the twelfth century, but the first confirmed mention is when it was acquired by Babur, the first of the Moguls, in 1526. It was known as 'Babur's Diamond' for the next 200 years. At some stage it was mounted in the Mogul's Peacock Throne. The throne formed part of the booty taken by Nadir, Shah of Persia, following the fall of Delhi in 1738. At that time it was described thus:
|
The Peacock Throne |
in form like one of our field beds, six feet long and four broad. The
cushion at the base is round like a bolster: the cushions on the sides
are flat. The underpart of the canopy is all embroidered with pearls and
diamonds, with a fringe of pearls round about. Upon the top of the
canopy, which is made like an arch with four panes, stands a peacock
with his tail spread, consisting all of saphirs and other proper colored
stones. The body is of beaten gold enchas'd with several jewels, and a
great ruby upon his breast, at which hangs a pearl that weighs 50
carats. On each side of the peacock stand two nosegays as high as the
bird, consisting of several sorts of flowers, all of beaten gold
enamelled. When the king seats himself upon the throne there is a
transparent jewel with a diamond appendant of eighty or ninety carats,
encompass'd with rubies and emeralds, so hung that it is always in his
eye. The twelve pillars also that uphold the canopy are set with rows of
fair pearl, round, and of excellent water, that weigh from six to ten
carats apiece. This is the famous throne which Tamerlane began and Cha
Jehan finish'd, which is really reported to have cost 160 million and
500,000 livres of our money.
|
Ranjit Singh |
On Nadir's assassination in 1747, the jewel was acquired by Ahmed Abdali, one of his generals, who on the break-up of the Persian empire became Emir of Afghanistan as Ahmed Shah Durrani. The Durrani empire was no more stable than any other in the region and following more bloody adventures the diamond left the country with Shuja Shah Durrani in 1813. It was seized from him by Ranjit Singh, the 'Lion of the Punjab' in return for help in regaining the Afghan throne. It was Ranjit's son, Kharak Signh who was deposed by the British. The Koh-i-Noor was presented to Queen Victoria by the 13-year-old Duleep Singh in 1850
The stone weighed in at just over 186 carats, but
was disappointing in appearance to western eyes. Lord Dalhousie, who had enforced the Treaty of Lahore, said 'the Koh-i-Noor is badly cut - it is
rose-cut, not -brilliant, and of course won’t sparkle like the latter.' The diamond was displayed at the Great Exhibition, where it received a mixed review from the Times:-
The Koh-i-noor is at present decidedly the lion of the Exhibition. A
mysterious interest appears to be attached to it, and now that so many
precautions have been restored to, and so much difficulty attends its
inspection, the crowd is enormously enhanced, and the policemen at
either end of the covered entrance have much trouble in restraining the
struggling and impatient multitude. For some hours yesterday there were
never less than a couple of hundred persons waiting their turn of
admission, and yet, after all, the diamond does not satisfy. Either from
the imperfect cutting or the difficulty of placing the lights
advantageously, or the immovability of the stone itself, which should be
made to revolve on its axis, few catch any of the brilliant rays it
reflects when viewed at a particular angle
|
On display at the Great Exhibition |
The decision was made to re-cut the diamond, and Messrs Coster of
Amsterdam
were given the job, the first cut being done by the Duke of Wellington. Thirty-eight days and £8,000 later it emerged as
an 'stellar brilliant' weighing just under 109 carats. Prince Albert was
unimpressed by such a radical reduction and
said so in the clearest terms. In 1853 Garrards mounted it in a tiara for the Queen which
contained more than two thousand diamonds. Five years later Queen
Victoria ordered a new regal circlet for the Koh-I-Noor which they
delivered the following year.
|
Queen Mary wearing her crown as a circlet |
Then in 1911 Garrards made a new crown
which Queen Mary wore for the coronation: it contained only diamonds,
among them the Koh-i-Noor and the Cullinan III and Cullinan IV. It could be worn as an eight half-arch crown or a circlet. For the 1937 coronation a new consort's crown was created for Queen Elizabeth, which similarly could be worn as a crown or circlet, and the Koh-i-Noor transferred to it. The Koh-i-Noor is set in the maltese cross at the front of the crown.
|
The consort's crown resting on the coffin of Queen Elizabeth, the Queen Mother, 2002 |
I don't know how I missed this when drafting this post, but the Koh-i-Noor features on the Order of Sartorial Splendor website, where it features as No 6 in 'The Queen's Top Ten Diamonds' - YES, there are five better!
ReplyDeleteOoS has done her usual top-rate job on the jewel and includes many interesting aspect that I haven't - http://orderofsplendor.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/queens-top-10-diamonds-6-koh-i-noor.html